PFASPFAS at Schiphol

It is found in non-stick pans, clothing, paint, food packaging, cosmetics and pesticides. The use of these products has led to Poly- and PerfluoroAlkyl Substances (PFAS) in the environment throughout the Netherlands. In the 1960s, this invention was hailed for its resistance to water, grease and oil. In the meantime, we are learning more and more about the downsides. PFAS can be harmful to the environment and health.

How PFAS ended up in the environment at Schiphol

Schiphol is not a producer of PFAS. Environmental contamination is due to firefighters' use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam. This extinguishing foam proved to be very suitable for extinguishing liquid fires and became the standard for fire departments around the world. From 1985, it was prescribed at airports for liquid fires. Due to the superior extinguishing effect, the fire brigade was able to extinguish an aircraft fire in no time, and within the legally stipulated time. 

The Schiphol fire brigade no longer uses PFAS-containing foam. They have not used it in training exercises at Schiphol since 2001 and have also stopped using it in incidents since 2020. A change in regulations at that time allowed the use of foam without PFAS 

PFAS Grondopslag

News

The latest news around PFAS at Schiphol.

Investigations and reports

Technical questions, reports and publications.

PFAS What is true?

Misunderstandings about PFAS at Schiphol.

Subscribe to our neighbour newsletter:

Do you want to receive periodic updates about runway maintenance and changes, developments and activities around Schiphol?